Penerapan Metode Topsis Untuk Menentukan Ustadz Dan Ustadzah Penerima Bonus Di Pesantren
PDF (Indonesian)

Keywords

Islamic boarding schools
Decision Support System
TOPSIS.

How to Cite

Penerapan Metode Topsis Untuk Menentukan Ustadz Dan Ustadzah Penerima Bonus Di Pesantren. (2023). TeknoIS : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Dan Sains, 13(2), 272-285. https://doi.org/10.36350/jbs.v13i2.194

Abstract

In teaching and learning activities at Islamic boarding schools, the role of ustadz and ustadzah as teaching staff has a major influence on the quality of graduation of students and female students. The appreciation of the pesantren is by giving awards in the form of financial bonuses according to their performance. We need a Decision Support System to solve this problem. The TOPSIS method can help the decision-making calculation process for many alternatives and criteria that can produce rankings by calculating the distance between the best and worst solutions. In this study the TOPSIS method was carried out using 15 alternatives and 5 criteria and importance weights that had been determined by the pesantren, namely 20% craft, 20% activity, 30% expertise, 15% education and 15% working period. The final result of the TOPSIS calculation found that Alternative 12 got the highest score of 0.5831 and Alternative 13 got the lowest score of 0.2850.

PDF (Indonesian)

References

Andri, & Suyanto. (2020). Sistem Informasi Penentuan Guru Terbaik Berbasis Kinerja pada Pondok Pesantren Qodratullah. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Digital Zone.

Arief, M. R. (2011). Pemrograman Web Dinamis Menggunakan PHP dan. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:: Rineka Cipta.

Defit, S., & Nofriansyah, D. (2017). Mutli Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Fitri, D., & Maulana, A. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik di SMK Pustek Serpong. International Journal of Education, Science, Technology and Engineering.

Harfizar, Saptono, A., & Kurniawan, B. (2018). Perancangan Sistem Informasi Penilaian Raport Siswa Berbasis Web Pada SMA Perintis 1 Sepatan. Journal Sensi: Strategic of Education in Information System, 103-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.33050/sensi.v4i1.718

Hertyana, H. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komputer, 4, 43-48. Diambil kembali dari http://ejournal.nusamandiri.ac.id/index.php/jitk/article/view/317

Kusumadewi, S. (2005). Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FMADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Limbong, T., Mutaqqin, Iskandar, A., Windarto, A. P., Simarmata, J., Mesran, Wanto, A. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & mplementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Muhaimin, & Mujib, A. (1993). Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam (Kajian Filosofis dan Kerangka Dasar Operasional. Bandung: Trigenda Karya.

Munshi, J. (2014). A Method for Constructing Likert Scales. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Sauro, & Lewis. (2012). Quantifying the User Experience Practical Statistic for User Research. Waltham: Elsevier Inc.

Shalahuddin, M., & Rosa, A. S. (2019). Perangkat Lunak Terstruktur dan Berorientasi Objek. Bandung: Informatika.

Sibero, A. F. (2013). Web Programing Power Pack. Yogyakarta.

Sprague, R., & Carlson, E. (1982). Building Effective Decision Support Systems. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

Warmansyah, J. (2020). Metode Penelitian Dan Pengolahan Data Untuk Pengambilan Keputusan Pada Perusahaan. Jakarta: Deepublish.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.