Keywords
TOPSIS Method
Position Promotion Recommendations
Spearman Rank
How to Cite
Abstract
In the world of education, especially in government agencies, teachers generally rotate, transfer and promote positions periodically. If a teacher's work is good then the teacher will receive an award commensurate with his work, otherwise the teacher will receive a warning so that the teacher improves his performance. In determining the promotion of teachers who are worthy of promotion to the position of principal, of course they will go through various stages of the assessment process and administrative filings based on certain criteria or requirements that have been determined. However, the problem currently being faced is the result of filing values having the same weight, close to the same, even exactly the same, of course this will make it difficult for agencies to make decisions. Therefore, applying the TOPSIS (Technique For Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method to this problem is a more appropriate and effective way. The existence of a recommendation system for determining promotion to the position of school principal will be more effective in its use. The system trial was carried out by 2 (Two) system experts with a score of 100% or was in the very worthy category for development, while the system trial carried out by 2 (Two) users using PSSUQ got a score of 94.19% or was in the very category worthy of implementation. And the ranking results have been tested using Spearman Rank correlation and produced a value of 0.92, which means the TOPSIS method can be used to determine recommendations for promotion to the position of school principal.
References
Afrizal. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Guru Menggunakan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS.
Arie, A., & Hidayat, W. (2023). Penerapan Metode Topsis Untuk Menentukan Ustadz Dan Ustadzah Penerima Bonus Di Pesantren. TeknoIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi dan Sains.
Ariq, H. I., & Pariddudin, A. (2023). Penerapan Metode Topsis Untuk Menentukan Buku Favorit Dalam Pengadaan Buku Perpustakaan. TeknoIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi dan Sains, 146-154.
Ghaniy, R., & Putra, R. D. (2021). Penerapan Metode TOPSIS dalam Penentuan Pengadaan Judul Buku di Perpustakaan. TeknoIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi dan Sains.
Lubis, D. J., & Anindita, N. A. (2021). Penerapan Metode Topsis Untuk Pemilihan Vendor Terbaik. TeknoIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi dan Sains, 19-30.
M, F. (2005). UML Distilled Third Edition A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Singapore: Addison-Wesley.
Melani, & Bachtiar. (2022). Analisis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Rekomendasi Kenaikan Pangkat PNS Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode TOPSIS dan SAW.
Nofriansyah. (2015). Sisitem pendukung keputusan TOPSIS. Yogyakarta.
Ogedebe, & Jacob. (2012). Software Prototyping: A Strategy to Use When User Lacks Data Processing Experience. ARPN Journal of Systems and Software.
Siswanti, L., & Kusumaningrum. (2020). Penerapan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS Sebagai Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menetukan Kenaikan Jabatan Bagi Guru. Surakarta.
Turban, E. (2005). Decision Support System and Intellegent System, 7th (Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dan Sistem Cerdas Jilid 1). Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.
Warmansyah. (2020). Metode Penelitian dan Pengolahan Data Untuk Pengambilan Keputusan Pada Perusahaan. Yogyakarta.
Warmansyah, J., & Ramadhan, Y. S. (2022). Penrapan Metode TOPSIS dalam Pentuan Prioritas Suplier Bahan Baku Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Obat. TeknoIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi dan Sains.
Wicaksana, B., & Pirdaus, M. (2024). Penerapan Metode Topsis Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Penyewaan Area Gudang Medis. TeknoIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi dan Sains.